About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, August 4th, 8:47PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Time to be more proactive

Wednesday, February 7th 2001, 12:20PM

Two issues that have enjoyed considerable coverage in the mainstream business press recently are, potentially, salient warnings to the savings industry, whether it be fund managers or advisers.

The first is that thorny old issue of fees and the second is the future of the New Zealand Stock Exchange.

Fees have hit the headlines in the lead up to Contact Energy's annual meeting. Readers will remember that last year Contact directors were unsuccessful in passing a motion to increase their fees as they were challenged on a technicality by a small shareholder, and they lost.

In the lead up to this year's meeting the directors again sought to win shareholder approval for a significant fee rise, but this time they chose to withdraw the motion in advance of the meeting because of vocal shareholder disapproval.

There's two salient points in this.

Investors will rebel when they see their investment performing poorly, yet the managers continue to get rewarded handsomely.

A Contact situation could occur in the managed funds industry following a year like 2000 when performance was in many cases negative, yet managers are still well remunerated.

Another of the outcomes of the Contact drama is the call for an association to be formed to represent the interests of the mom and pop investors.

This is a great gesture, but it already faces considerable hurdles. To be effective it needs strong resources, such as funding and organisational capabilities, and it also needs intellectual grunt.

A substitute for a small shareholders association could be a grouping of institutional investors and fund managers. Such associations are common overseas, but New Zealand managers have never got past informal discussions about creating such a grouping.

The need for the professional funds management industry has become even more obvious against the backdrop of discussion about the future of the New Zealand Stock Exchange.

Many fund managers have, quite rightly pointed out, that the poor performance of the sharemarket is not so much the exchange itself, but the governance and management of the companies listed on the board.

Managers who adopt the active approach to looking after money love telling us about how many company visits they do each year. But what do they do on these visits? Do they just listen to what the company has to say, or do they also put pressure on them to pick up their act in areas of management and governance?

Clearly some managers like Arcus have made a point of telling the world that they are not afraid to tell management how poor a job they are doing, and others, such as BT Funds Management, take a pro-active approach, albeit less public.

Maybe it is time for fund managers to pool their resources and be far more proactive in this area. After all they would be looking after investors' best interests.

Such a move may also be a good catalyst to improving the overall performance of the New Zealand sharemarket.

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Attitudes to advice cost must change
    “I am delighted to read a paper that is pro-advice and recognises the vital role that good financial advice does play in society....”
    22 hours ago by Dirty Harry
  • Attitudes to advice cost must change
    “The challenge for the industry is to outline & justify what value they're adding, in exchange for payment. Unfortunately...”
    2 days ago by Pragmatic
  • Massey calls for Act overhaul
    “Completely agree with Tash, unfortunately common sense does not prevail and the last few years have been a complete waste...”
    3 days ago by Broker
  • Massey calls for Act overhaul
    “@tash if these "experts" understood or at least willing to listen to us, we will not be having this dialogue in the first...”
    4 days ago by w k
  • HSBC does it again
    “Apologies for the typo - the above should read "$1.020m for two years at 4.69%"...”
    4 days ago by Laurie
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 6.24 5.10 5.59 5.59
ANZ Special - 4.89 4.99 -
ASB Bank 6.50 ▼5.05 ▼5.25 ▼5.35
ASB Bank Special - ▼4.69 ▼4.89 ▼4.99
BankDirect 6.50 ▼5.05 ▼5.25 ▼5.35
BankDirect Special - ▼4.69 ▼4.89 ▼4.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.65 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 6.24 - - -
BNZ - Special - - 4.69 -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 6.24 5.19 5.39 5.29
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.99 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.45 5.75 5.75 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct 6.10 6.45 6.69 7.10
First Credit Union 6.45 - - -
HBS Bank 6.14 5.39 5.39 5.39
HBS Special - 4.99 4.99 4.99
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heretaunga Building Society 6.45 5.10 5.40 -
Housing NZ Corp 6.49 5.19 5.49 5.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Premier 6.60 4.89 4.89 ▼4.99
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - ▼4.49 ▼4.49 ▼4.49
ICBC 6.75 5.99 6.39 -
Kiwibank 6.15 5.39 5.49 5.69
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 6.40 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 5.09 4.99 5.39
Liberty - - - -
Napier Building Society 6.50 5.80 6.70 -
Nelson Building Society 6.70 5.65 5.95 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
NZ Home Loans 6.60 5.39 5.49 6.29
Perpetual Trust 7.70 - - -
Resimac 5.84 5.60 5.65 5.79
SBS Bank 6.14 5.39 5.39 5.39
SBS Bank Special - 4.99 4.99 4.99
Sovereign 6.35 ▼5.05 ▼5.25 ▼5.35
Sovereign Special - ▼4.69 ▼4.89 ▼4.99
The Co-operative Bank 6.20 4.89 ▼4.79 ▼4.99
TSB Bank 6.24 5.45 5.49 5.40
TSB Special - - 4.99 5.40
Wairarapa Building Society 6.20 5.75 5.95 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac 6.15 5.39 5.39 5.59
Westpac - Capped rates - ▼6.15 ▼6.15 -
Westpac - Offset 6.15 - - -
Westpac Special - - ▼4.69 -
Median 6.45 5.19 5.39 5.39

Last updated: 5 August 2015 7:33am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com