About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, May 23rd, 9:13PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Morningstar backs off threat to Russell

Morningstar has backed off threats to sue fellow researcher Frank Russell over its analysis of star ratings.

Thursday, November 29th 2001, 10:20AM

by Philip Macalister

Morningstar has backed off threats to sue fellow researcher Frank Russell over its analysis of star ratings.

The stoush between the two firms started after Good Returns ran a feature where Frank Russell's Australasian boss Alan Schoenheimer presented research showing star ratings have little power at predicting future performance. (Read the feature here).

After the article was picked up and published by the Australian media former Morningstar ceo and publisher Graham Rich threatened to sue Frank Russell for defamation.

In a statement issued to Frank Russell yesterday, Morningstar's US-based parent company confirmed that it would not push ahead with any suit filed or intended to be filed against Frank Russell by Rich.

Rich had alleged the Frank Russell report, which used data from Morningstar, was defamatory and had caused the Morningstar star ratings model to suffer reputational damage.

The Russell report concluded that star rating systems are not a reliable indicator of future short-term performance.

"The star rating of a fund appears to have a slight correlation with its past performance, no clear correlation with its future performance, and should not be the sole basis for investment decision-making," he says.

The report found that $1000 invested in an average five star rated Morningstar fund between June 1998 and June 2000 would have produced $1460 at the end of the two year period. But $1000 invested in a three and four star fund would have produced $1481 and $1588 respectively, despite the funds' lower rating.

Schoenheimer says investors and advisers have to be alert to the limitations of star ratings systems.

"The consequences of relying solely on star ratings for making a decision on a future investment are just too great. If you buy a five star ranked fund today, don't bet on it delivering you a five star return in a year's time."

Read the original story here: How much performance is in the stars?


And Graham Rich's original response: Morningstar questions Russell

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« Contributory mortgages under spotlightSovereign takes regulation bull by the horns »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Life-Info founders want industry to take it over
    “Just to emphasise that we would like this to be regarded as an INDUSTRY resource as per the headline. We receive support...”
    2 days ago by dcwhyte
  • FMA acknowledges regulatory 'burden'
    “Very good and relevant points Brent, and you have been around well long enough to know. The GFC was 'hatched' from the largest...”
    5 days ago by Winka
  • FMA acknowledges regulatory 'burden'
    “Mr Gregory forgets the most important “cost” of regulatory burden and that is lower profitability of the finance sector....”
    5 days ago by Brent Sheather
  • Look twice at insurance applications
    “I couldn't agree more, this area of advice is lacking and is a massive contributor to non-payment of claims. Clean skins...”
    5 days ago by RiskAdviser
  • Wholesale rules a missed opportunity
    “Can someone tell me what the problem is about having a number of definitions for "wholesale" as far as advisers are concerned? Is...”
    6 days ago by Murray Weatherston
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.99 5.35 5.59
ANZ Special - 4.49 4.85 -
ASB Bank 5.80 4.85 5.14 5.49
ASB Bank Special - 4.45 4.74 5.09
BankDirect 5.80 4.85 5.14 5.49
BankDirect Special - 4.45 4.74 5.09
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.99 5.19 5.49
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.95 5.10 5.25 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 5.00 5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.79 4.99 5.14 5.49
HSBC Premier 5.79 4.09 4.29 4.89
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.70 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.70 5.09 5.19 5.65
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.70 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.69 4.79 5.25
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.00 4.86 4.75 5.30
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank 5.79 4.99 5.19 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 4.59 4.79 5.25
Sovereign 5.90 4.85 5.14 5.49
Sovereign Special - 4.45 4.74 5.09
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 4.59 4.85 5.25
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 5.09 5.35 5.75
TSB Bank 5.65 4.80 5.15 5.45
TSB Special - 4.55 4.75 5.15
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.84 4.99 5.29 5.59
Westpac - Capped rates - 5.15 5.25 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac - Offset 5.84 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.59 4.85 5.09
Median 5.80 4.85 5.14 5.38

Last updated: 19 May 2017 9:26am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com