Phil: What’s in a name?
Friday, August 6th 2010, 11:11AM
2 Comments
by Philip Macalister
You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/
| « It's time for Gareth to shut up | Time is of the essence » |
Comments from our readers
I remember in the mid 1980's when I met up with Doug (Somers)Edgar, and I agreed to join him in the launch of a new company,... a new NAME..!
We enjoyed many of those earlier years in the 80's and into the 90's building portfolios of "MONEY to MANAGE", and he proved (albeit suggested by many to be a bit of a "maverick")to be a master of "marketing".
Thankfully, my business with that company was sold nearly 10 years ago.
However,through the years, I had grown to quite like the... "NAME"... of it and had taken the opportunity in a 'visionary' sense to take formal legal ownership of the name (including the logo and branding associated).
The High Court ruled in my favour ....naturally,.. and Doug was ordered to change their name...nowhere near as good as the old NAME according to everyone.
Is it now nearing time to re-launch the NAME?
A few have even stated the obvious "why re-launch THAT name...it could be so negative??"
Why not join those who can see a 'positive' in a re-launch........... with a new theme?
Still to be called ..."MONEY MANAGERS" ??.....watch this space.
Yep...the ONEPATH name makes me think of being 'led up the garden path'....and only one option?
Interested?
Michael Donovan ('Google' ...Moneobiz)
Add your comment:
| Printable version | Email to a friend |




