tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, March 28th, 10:13PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Leitch: Don't change the rules already

A consultation process on the Financial Advisers Act is a good opportunity to make sure the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment understands what advisers actually do, says PAA chairman Peter Leitch.

Wednesday, January 30th 2013, 9:54AM 5 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

MoBIE has issued a discussion document calling for input on a range of subjects. Financial advisers groups have been holding meetings with the Ministry to discuss it.


Leitch said the people he met at the Ministry were trying to understand the issues that have affected financial advisers. “It’s a genuine attempt to start a period of consultation to understand the consequences, and the unintended consequences, of regulation.”
 

He said the enduring message he tried to leave with the Minitstry was not to change things too much. He said regulation needed some time to bed in and for everyone to become comfortable with it. “The worst thing is if there’s no confidence.”
 

One of the questions being asked is: Is the RFA terminology appropriate, or should it be replaced by something less likely to imply a licensed professional status?

Leitch said: “I think they would be foolish to do anything about the word RFA. People ned to be seen as being an adviser.”

He said whether people were Registered Financial Advisers, Authorised Financial Advisers or part of a Qualifying Financial Entity was less important than that they had the confidence to go out and do their job.
 

He said if someone wanted to obtain insurance, going to an adviser with the right knowledge was the important thing, not whether they went to an AFA or RFA.


But the question proved there had been some discussion about it, he said.

« Government questions RFAs' professionalismFund managers call for level playing field »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 31 January 2013 at 9:04 am John Milner said:
Peter stated, "if someone wanted to obtain insurance, going to an adviser with the right knowledge was the important thing". Unless the adviser has met a standard, albeit a minimum one as AFA, how is the potential client to know if they have the right knowledge and meets at least a minimum acceptable compliance standard?

I am proud to personally know some very competent and professional risk advisers. I also know some who have spent many years in the business who just don't make the grade - not at today's standards at least.

The regulations are not here to pick on individuals or groups but to provide confidence to the general public. For this to be achieved we must have standards across the board.

Let's encourage RFA's to get to AFA status, not rebadge them and alienate them further.
On 31 January 2013 at 1:38 pm Giles Thorman said:
I would be very interested to know what I would learn that I do not already know by becoming an AFA rather than an RFA as I currently am?

Surely the important point to remember is that the public (i.e. our clients) actually now have recourse to a complaints process with enforceable penalties if an advisers advise or process is found to be wanting. This standard applies equally whether you are an RFA or an AFA.

Similar to John Milner above , I also know many RFAs (but also AFAs), some who are excellent, some just competent and some I would not walk across the street to put out if they were on fire. The complaints process MAY fix this problem; however whether they are AFA or RFA will not matter one iota. There are many far more important problems to solve in this Industry than whether RFAs all become AFAs or some other title.

As Peter Leitch rightly says and has rightly advocated, let this bed in.
On 31 January 2013 at 2:20 pm Amused said:
Well said Giles.
On 31 January 2013 at 4:12 pm Insurance salesman said:
I intend to encourage AFAs to become RFAs...$5 donation to the SPCA for each one...anyone keen?
On 1 February 2013 at 1:51 pm Mark Jory said:
As an AFA I don't care whether they change the RFA title or not, what I would like to see is some promotion - as was origianally promised - from the FMA to make it clear to the public what the difference is between the two designations.

Or perhaps RFA's could be forced to state in their Primary Disclosure Statement that they do NOT hold any legislated qualification to give advice.

This wouldn't stop them from telling their prospective clients about any other qualifications, knowledge, experience and applicable skills that they do hold.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA - Back My Build 6.19 - - -
AIA - Go Home Loans 8.74 7.24 6.79 6.65
ANZ 8.64 7.84 7.39 7.25
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39 - - -
ANZ Good Energy - - - 1.00
ANZ Special - 7.24 6.79 6.65
ASB Bank 8.64 7.24 6.79 6.65
ASB Better Homes Top Up - - - 1.00
Avanti Finance 9.15 - - -
Basecorp Finance 9.60 - - -
Bluestone 9.24 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Classic - 7.24 6.79 6.65
BNZ - Green Home Loan top-ups - - - 1.00
BNZ - Mortgage One 8.69 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 8.69 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 8.69 7.84 7.39 7.25
BNZ - TotalMoney 8.69 - - -
CFML Loans 9.45 - - -
China Construction Bank - 7.09 6.75 6.49
China Construction Bank Special - - - -
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 7.04 - -
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 8.40 7.24 6.79 6.65
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Co-operative Bank - Standard 8.40 7.74 7.29 7.15
Credit Union Auckland 7.70 - - -
First Credit Union Special - 7.45 7.35 -
First Credit Union Standard 8.50 7.99 7.85 -
Heartland Bank - Online 7.99 6.69 6.45 6.19
Heartland Bank - Reverse Mortgage - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 8.90 7.60 7.40 -
HSBC Premier 8.59 - - -
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 7.85 7.05 6.75 6.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kainga Ora 8.64 7.79 7.39 7.25
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Kiwibank 8.50 8.25 7.79 7.55
Kiwibank - Offset 8.50 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 7.25 6.79 6.65
Liberty 8.59 8.69 8.79 8.94
Nelson Building Society 9.00 7.75 7.35 -
Pepper Money Advantage 10.49 - - -
Pepper Money Easy 8.69 - - -
Pepper Money Essential 8.29 - - -
Resimac - LVR < 80% 8.84 ▼8.09 ▼7.59 ▼7.29
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Resimac - LVR < 90% 9.84 ▼9.09 ▼8.59 ▼8.29
Resimac - Specialist Clear (Alt Doc) - - 8.99 -
Resimac - Specialist Clear (Full Doc) - - 9.49 -
SBS Bank 8.74 7.84 7.45 7.25
SBS Bank Special - 7.24 6.85 6.65
SBS Construction lending for FHB - - - -
SBS FirstHome Combo 6.19 6.74 - -
SBS FirstHome Combo - - - -
SBS Unwind reverse equity 9.95 - - -
Select Home Loans 9.24 - - -
TSB Bank 9.44 8.04 7.55 7.45
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 8.64 7.24 6.75 6.65
Unity 8.64 6.99 6.79 -
Unity First Home Buyer special - - 6.45 -
Wairarapa Building Society 8.60 6.95 6.85 -
Westpac 8.64 7.89 7.49 7.25
Westpac Choices Everyday 8.74 - - -
Westpac Offset 8.64 - - -
Westpac Special - 7.29 6.89 6.65
Median 8.64 7.29 7.32 6.65

Last updated: 28 March 2024 9:42am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com