About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, March 30th, 10:31PM
Latest Headlines

Robo not just for investment

Changes to law and technology pose a substantial threat to traditional risk insurance advisers - an effective response mean embracing substantial, rapid and sometimes difficult change, writes lawyer Simon Papa, who was formerly a senior solicitor at the FMA.

Wednesday, November 9th 2016, 6:00AM

Roboadvice for risk insurance advice is less developed than for wealth management, but it is already here in some guises e.g. automated assessment tools from Quotemonster and Strategi.  Many businesses in New Zealand are actively investigating roboadvice initiatives for the consumer insurance market.  Those initiatives will produce services that support human advisers and that also replace them.  That and proposed changes to law are a substantial threat to advisers and also present significant opportunities.  I briefly consider key factors that will drive change in the risk insurance advice sector and a possible response.

Fintech Future

The fintech sector has grown enormously in the last three years- $19.1 billion was invested in the sector in 2015 worldwide.  There is no doubt that technology will have an increasingly significant impact.  It already has in many other sectors, the impact of Xero on accountants’ businesses being just one of many examples.  

Financial advice is a natural target for digital disrupters because much of the advice process can be easily reduced to algorithms and on-line processes.  An example is PolicyGenius in the US, which provides online, end-to-end, personalised roboadvice on risk insurance.  Also, fees are high, which attracts entrants.

Younger consumers are not only comfortable engaging with service providers on-line, most now expect to.  This was highlighted in Minter Ellison’s report on roboadvice prepared by its millennial staff. While younger consumers currently have relatively little to invest (slowing uptake of roboadvice for wealth management) they are a key market for risk insurance. 

Current Model

The current advice process is outmoded, often comprising multiple face-to-face meetings.  There is no clarity on what an adviser is paid or what impact that has on adviser behaviour.  The lack of confidence this causes is reflected in consumer surveys.

Consumer insurance advice businesses are often small, relying on outsourced service providers like dealer groups and compliance consultants.  One consequence is that there are no consumer brands in the insurance advice sector and limited consumer awareness of the benefits of insurance advice.  Insurance advisers have the option of getting licensed now but, of the 56 QFEs, only two are insurance advice firms, both focusing mainly on businesses.  Overall, existing industry structures and models haven’t responded effectively to previous regulatory change and aren’t well placed to respond to upcoming challenges.  In contrast larger businesses that face disruption (like banks) have, recognising the risks, embraced technology and innovation –they’re better placed to benefit from regulatory and technological change.  


New financial advice law is likely to be in force by late 2017 and will be a trigger for major change.  That’s not just because roboadvice will be permitted (true roboadvice could be provided under the current regime).  The removal of the class/personalised advice distinction will make it easier for product providers to provide personalised advice services enhanced by efficient robo tools.

The key risk for the advice industry is that it doesn’t adapt, becoming a marginalised channel, out-competed by product providers and new entrants.  But adaption that consists of doubling down on the existing model with cost cutting and a Facebook page is unlikely to work.  Wearing polo shirts or offering Starbucks to attract millennials definitely won’t! 

A Possible Response

Risk insurance is complex and consumers should ideally have advice.  Product providers (and tied advisers) won’t necessarily provide the best advice (the “consumers’ interests first” standard won’t change that).  Actual and perceived independence is the unique selling proposition that will allow advisers to distinguish themselves from other advice channels.  But to achieve that advisers may need to move to an upfront fee model (or full fee disclosure)- easier as the efficiencies of innovation bring costs down significantly.

To continue to compete on service advisers will need to embrace substantial, rapid and sometimes difficult change.  That probably means operating as a true corporate and at scale, with front-end services increasingly delivered on-line (or by relationship managers using robo tools), and with a client’s key relationship being with the business not individual advisers.  Such businesses would have sufficient resources and capability to promote themselves effectively to a mass market, to operate more efficiently and to innovate.

The future is bright for risk insurance advisers who embrace change and real innovation.

« Advisers tackle client-first questionBack to the novel for holiday reading »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • FARs - where's the accountability?
    “doomben - you may reconsider your confidence in the BEOT after you ahve digested the following: "Entity licencing –...”
    17 hours ago by gavin austin adviser business compliance
  • FARs - where's the accountability?
    “Doomben, I think you are living in a fools paradise if you feel this way. The amount of investors' money that is involved...”
    22 hours ago by R1
  • AIA offers bolt-on cancer drug cover
    “Interesting concept but irrelevant if you have medical cover which pays for non-pharmac drugs. It is only available with...”
    23 hours ago by Tash
  • What the RB governor said
    “Is it a surprise that you don't receive any readers' comments when you refuse to publish anything that is critical of the...”
    2 days ago by DT
  • FARs - where's the accountability?
    “I think the Nicky Hager type 'corruption in high places' line is getting tiresome. My guess is the main reason regulation...”
    2 days ago by doomben
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News


Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.89 5.29 5.49
ANZ Special - 4.49 4.79 -
ASB Bank 5.80 4.99 5.19 5.49
ASB Bank Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BankDirect 5.80 4.99 5.19 5.49
BankDirect Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.99 5.19 5.49
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.95 4.99 5.25 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heretaunga Building Society ▲5.75 ▲5.00 ▲5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.65 4.89 5.19 5.49
HSBC Premier 5.59 4.19 4.39 4.89
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.70 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.55 4.99 5.19 5.65
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.55 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.59 4.79 5.25
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
NZ Home Loans 5.80 4.99 5.19 5.49
NZ Home Loans - Specials - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
NZ Home Loans - Specials - 4.59 4.79 5.09
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
SBS Bank ▲5.79 4.99 5.19 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 4.59 4.79 5.25
Sovereign 5.90 4.99 5.19 5.49
Sovereign Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.65 4.59 4.85 5.25
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.65 5.09 5.35 5.75
TSB Bank 5.65 4.80 5.15 5.45
TSB Special - 4.55 4.75 5.15
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac 5.75 4.99 5.19 5.49
Westpac - Capped rates - 5.15 5.25 -
Westpac - Offset 5.75 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
Median 5.79 4.88 5.17 5.38

Last updated: 30 March 2017 12:38pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com