About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, June 23rd, 5:24PM
Check out GoodReturns TV now! Dismiss
rss
Latest Headlines

Last attempt to change exemptions

Financial adviser groups have made one last attempt to get the rules tightened for accountants and lawyers who offer advice.

Tuesday, April 18th 2017, 6:00AM 1 Comment

by Susan Edmunds

Both professions can provide financial advice outside the scope of the rules that bind financial advisers, when it is incidental to another part of their business that is not a financial service.

It has been argued throughout the review of the Financial Advisers Act that such exemptions are unfair.

But the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment indicated it was not something it had an appetite to change because there was little evidence that it put consumers at risk.

Now, at the last stage of feedback on the new regime, advice groups have made their point again.

The Institute of Financial Advisers and Share both raised the issue in their submissions on the exposure draft of the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Bill.

The IFA said it was disappointed that accountants, lawyers and real estate agents would be able to continue to "dodge" the requirements of financial advice.

"This has been a contentious issue with our members for some time," it said.

"We recognise that it is not feasible or likely that these businesses can be made to comply with all of the rules of the regime but feel that the exclusions from the definition of financial advice need to be additionally strengthened by 'clear and effective processes and controls' in relation to this 'incidental' part of their business."

It said advisers were able to provide accounting advice in areas in which they were competent. "The reverse situation should exist for accountants and lawyers, as professionals they should not be able to conduct business or give financial advice without completing the same competency requirement of a financial adviser."

Advice group Share agreed it was problematic. "If a car dealer's principal activity is selling cars, then the provision of insurance may be seen as incidental. But surely those consumers deserve the protection of the law around provision of financial advice. Similarly a real estate agent who offers lending advice or an accountant who offers KiwiSaver advice."

The IFA said it also had concerns about the provision of execution-only services, which are not bound by code of conduct requirements.

"There is as much potential of consumer harm in an execution-only transaction from not knowing the risks of proceeding or not proceeding, if an FA, FAR, FAP or excluded business or individual is not bound by the code in the case of a transaction then there is opportunity for loopholes and abuse of the Act.

"All of consumers' advisers should have an ethical obligation and should be competent to understand the limitations or risk a consumer faces for taking a course of action the consumer has chosen. We cannot think of another Act that allows individual to step out of their legal liability without ensuring the consumer is making an informed decision."

READ MORE: Advisers can work with many entities: MBIE

 

Tags: Financial Markets Conduct Act

« Getting to Know: Rod SevernStudies in succession planning »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 18 April 2017 at 8:32 am Backstage said:
This idea is a mess, it should be clear that advice should not be given in a field in which the adviser is not competent. I have accounting knowledge through various papers and do not ever give advice despite what i know. I recently reviewed 3 shareholders business and personal insurance (clients of mine) portfolios for year end. They all instructed me that they would like to cancel their personal Income Protection plans as their accountant informed them that their TPD and Trauma has it covered (despite those covers being owned by the business). The accountant insisted that they were insuring the same thing and had doubled up... I kept the business but i did not need an accountant with half baked advice about something he knew little about interfering... i did explain the situation to the clients and did ask delicately if the accountant was prepared to cover them for their monthly incomes if an event fell outside the TPD and Trauma covers.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • QROPS adviser breached code: FADC
    “@murrayweatherston NZ-based AFAs who make out that they are UK pensions specialists surely wouldn't arrange a UK transfer...”
    19 hours ago by Denis
  • QROPS adviser breached code: FADC
    “@Denis You must have a different decision than me. In my copy 1. XYZ said the UK end was out of scope. That is, the answer...”
    22 hours ago by Murray Weatherston
  • Time to rebrand trauma: IFSO
    “Actually I disagree because there are a number of conditions that do not relate to "illness", e.g. paralysis, loss of sight,...”
    23 hours ago by Referee
  • Time to rebrand trauma: IFSO
    “Agree, policies/benefits should be named and marketed based on how they perform. There are some so called trauma covers...”
    1 day ago by HumbleAFA
  • QROPS adviser breached code: FADC
    “@murrayweatherston - my issue is not with the process. It's that the position with the "UK end" part of the transfer (i.e....”
    1 day ago by Denis
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.99 5.35 5.59
ANZ Special - 4.49 4.85 -
ASB Bank 5.80 4.85 5.14 5.49
ASB Bank Special - 4.45 4.74 5.09
BankDirect 5.80 4.85 5.14 5.49
BankDirect Special - 4.45 4.74 5.09
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.59 4.74 5.09
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.99 5.29 5.59
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.95 5.45 5.50 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 5.00 5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.79 4.85 5.14 5.49
HSBC Premier 5.79 4.09 4.29 4.89
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.70 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.70 5.09 5.19 5.65
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.70 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.69 4.79 5.25
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.00 4.86 4.75 5.30
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank 5.79 4.99 5.29 5.59
SBS Bank Special - 4.59 4.85 5.25
Sovereign 5.90 4.85 5.14 5.49
Sovereign Special - 4.45 4.74 5.09
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 4.59 4.85 5.25
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 5.09 5.35 5.75
TSB Bank 5.80 4.80 5.15 5.45
TSB Special - 4.55 ▼4.49 5.15
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.95 4.99 5.29 5.59
Westpac - Capped rates - 5.26 5.36 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac - Offset 5.95 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.59 4.85 5.09
Median 5.80 4.85 5.14 5.38

Last updated: 19 June 2017 9:16am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com