tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Sunday, December 8th, 7:32PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Thinking behind voluntary authorisation explained

Risks of implementing voluntary authorisation are the creation of a de facto regulatory standard and the dilution of the authorised financial adviser (AFA) brand according to the proposal made to Cabinet.

Tuesday, September 28th 2010, 5:53AM 2 Comments

by Jenha White

However, the Ministry of Economic Development (MED) and Commerce Minister Simon Power make it clear in the Voluntary Authorisation Cabinet Paper that these risks are not significant and do not outweigh the benefits of implementing voluntary authorisation.

Cabinet agreed and last week it was announced that regulations are to be developed to allow voluntary authorisation under the Financial Advisers Act (FAA).

In the paper Power says there is a risk that voluntary authorisation may compel a number of category two advisers to become authorised to maintain their existing business.

"As greater numbers of insurance advisers and mortgage brokers become authorised, it is likely that there will be increased competitive pressures on the remaining parts of the sector to seek authorisation. This in turn will have the effect of creating a minimum standard for the industry."

Power and the MED believe however, that this consequence is consistent with encouraging consumer access to competent advisers.

The second issue brought to light is the possible dilution of the AFA brand.

The main concern here is that consumers may not understand that there will be a category of AFAs who will be unable to provide advice on investment matters which could create general confusion about the appropriate adviser to use for specific advisory needs.

However Power is not convinced that the risk is significant. He says the purpose of authorisation was to provide quality assurance and accordingly, an AFA will be held to the same standard, irrespective of the type of product, enabling category two advisers to voluntarily become authorised.

The MED says this risk may be mitigated by the imposition of terms and conditions by the commission.

"Such terms and conditions could require advisers who are limited to providing category two services to disclose the scope of their authorisation to their clients. If the proposed regulations are promulgated, it is likely that the commission will require such disclosure under their terms and conditions."

It says the draft Code and the proposed disclosure regulations will also require advisers to disclose any limitations on their scope of their financial adviser services including any limitations on the financial products or range of financial products they are permitted to advise upon.

As a result of analysing these costs and also looking at the benefits Power and the MED both recommended that regulations be developed that allow a person to seek authorisation to provide financial adviser services in relation to category two products.

DOWNLOAD full paper here

Jenha is a TPL staff reporter. jenha@tarawera.co.nz

« Industry delighted with voluntary authorisationQFEs like sales point for retail products »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 28 September 2010 at 4:20 pm Independent Observer said:
It seems that the Politicians (in their infinite wisdom) have opted for an unlevel playing field – reliant upon the consumer to distinguish between various industry accreditations.

I guess time will prove whether this laissez faire approach will work – although my money is on an environment of confusion, arbitration and continued deregulation of the financial services industry.

Wouldn’t it be neat if for once the Politicians & rule-makers could put the interests of consumers ahead of industry-bodies with lobbiests…
On 1 October 2010 at 10:34 am Andy Phillipson said:
I agree with you I.O. regarding putting the consumers interests first. I also see future issues with Authorised advisers now having the legal ability to provide some services, yet lacking the practical knowledge and skill to do so - in effect bringing us back to where we were, for example – mortgage brokers giving investment advice on unfamiliar products, or unqualified bank staff giving advice on unit trusts! At the risk of creating more unnecessary legislation, the whole financial industry needs more segment specific education and control, rather than the present attempt at making one shoe to fit all! As I have said before – I believe the current legislation has missed the boat completely…
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com