About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, July 18th, 7:09PM
Latest Headlines

FSC must fix its own ructions before it can fix industry

There probably aren't many people who would want to be in the Financial Services Council's shoes right now.

Wednesday, November 4th 2015, 12:00PM 2 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

The industry body is the representative of insurers and banks in New Zealand. But it is struggling with internal division, relevancy and against its own financial situation.

In theory, now should be its time to shine.

The Financial Advisers Act is a chance for it to really make its mark and drive changes desired by the big end of town.

But instead the FSC seems to be struggling to keep its house in order.

It has been spending on things that it does not have the revenue for, perhaps partly due to a board used to operating with a bit more money at their disposal.

There were some one-off costs, such as redundancy payments and a lease break fee associated with the closure of its Wellington offices at the end of last year.

But this seems to be something that has been brewing for a while - it is understood that there was some disquiet in the FSC ranks previously about hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a KiwiSaver report, and reportedly half a million on its much-whispered about Melville Jessup Weaver report into industry churn.

The financial mire prompted FSC to change its rules recently Instead of requiring three months' notice from those wanting to resign, it now wants 12.

That is so that if things really turn to custard and all the members jump ship, the last one left at the table isn't handed the bill.

But AMP and Sovereign have reportedly given their notice. Neilson says it's a formality and just giving them the option to leave at the end of the 12-month period but industry sources disagree.

Without AMP and Sovereign, FSC has a much harder job to claim it is an industry representative.

Some sources say things got a lot tougher for the FSC after it decided to ditch its Wellington presence. Neilson has a strong political background but even that is not enough to make up for the fact that not being in Wellington can make it harder to have an impact on Government.

There are industry concerns that the FSC isn't taken seriously enough by politicians. Some big players have taken the decision that lobbying on their own can be more effective than pooling resources with the FSC.

That has left FSC doing the sort of work that has felt a bit like tinkering around the edges - promoting income protection insurance and criticising a Treasury report into KiwiSaver.

The departure of former Prime Minister Jenny Shipley from the position of chair won't have helped.

Neilson has the unenviable task of trying to unite a diverse group of industry players - something that has been made clear with the MJW report experience.

Media were told the report was being done but months later no one but the FSC board has officially seen even the draft - it is believed to have been sent back to MJW for more work. 

When some FSC members have strongly criticised the level of commission and replacement business practices in insurance and others have steadfastly stood by the new status quo, that is perhaps unsurprising. Some have wondered whether the report will ever be finalised.

The FSC has a valuable role to play in New Zealand's industry but it needs to get beyond these internal divisions – or the impression of them – to be able to do it to its full potential.

Tags: FSC

« What is the problem the FAA is trying to fix?The time is up for the FSC »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 4 November 2015 at 5:04 pm Pragmatic said:
The only "club" in town is called the FMA. Everything else must have a clear value proposition to remain in business
On 10 November 2015 at 1:06 pm Majella said:
This outfit has always felt, to me, to be anti-advisers - witness the debacle over the ISI's (as was) attempt to introduce a uniform Advice on Replacement Business form a few years back.

The rabid desire to emulate the Trowbridge Report here always smelled like a set-up: a subterfuge to suppress commissions and thereby squeeze the non-aligned sector of the industry. The eventual beneficiaries of any reduction in that sector would only ever be the QFEs - for which you may substitute "Australian Banks".

So, good on Naomi & Partners for calling out this farcical institution - may it soon wither & die, and the abhorrent, vested-interest-serving MJW "report".

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Pathfinder-backed KiwiSaver to target gender diversity
    “This is a great initiative by Pathfinder - congratulations on taking a risk, and standing up for something that you believe...”
    6 hours ago by Pragmatic
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “@all Put your cheque books away - no need to pay the lawyers to do the research to provide an opinion...... In my old...”
    22 hours ago by Murray Weatherston
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “Further reading - Kinsington Swan in February 2018 https://www.kensingtonswan.com/news-updates-and-events/financial-advice-reforms-insights-series-14-penalties-enforcement-complaints-and-disciplinary-matters/...”
    1 day ago by all hat, no cattle
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “MPT and Murray this might help https://www.fma.govt.nz/assets/Fact-sheets/Who-will-need-a-licence-to-provide-financial-advice...”
    1 day ago by all hat, no cattle
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “Thanks Murray, it seems we are on the same page. Be great if the regulators could confirm or not. AHNC, I agree I dont...”
    1 day ago by MPT Heretic
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.69 4.35 4.35 4.55
ANZ Special - 3.85 3.85 4.05
ASB Bank 5.70 4.29 4.35 4.55
ASB Bank Special - 3.89 3.85 4.05
BNZ - Classic - 3.85 3.85 4.05
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.40 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.85 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.80 4.69 4.59 4.79
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.80 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.60 4.75 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.80 4.69 4.49 4.45
HSBC Premier 5.89 3.79 3.79 3.89
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.65 3.85 3.95 3.89
Kiwibank 5.80 4.60 ▼4.60 ▼4.74
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.65 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 3.85 ▼3.85 ▼3.99
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 4.89 4.99 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.14 4.19
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.79 4.85 5.05 5.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 3.85 3.85 3.99
Sovereign 5.80 4.29 4.35 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.89 3.85 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.65 3.89 3.89 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.65 4.39 4.39 4.55
TSB Bank 5.69 4.45 4.35 4.55
TSB Special - 3.95 3.85 4.05
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.79 4.69 4.79 5.19
Westpac - Offset 5.79 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.85 3.85 4.05
Median 5.80 4.35 4.35 4.19

Last updated: 15 July 2019 9:47am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com