About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, November 17th, 11:40AM
rss
Latest Headlines

The time is up for the FSC

[OPINION] The Financial Services Council is dead and its chief executive Peter Neilson should resign.

Thursday, November 12th 2015, 7:22AM 3 Comments

by Philip Macalister

There is a place for an organisation to represent the interests of “product manufacturers” whether it is investments, life insurance or KiwiSaver.

However, the organisation that represents them needs to stick to working on things like technical issues and education.

An example of the good work the FSC can do is its Mind the Gap Forum  next week.

It is not the job of the Council to delve into competitive issues. How life companies choose to remunerate their distribution force is a competitive issue.

If a company wants to pay 200% plus upfront that is their commercial decision.

Remember too, that it is the companies that make the decision how much to pay advisers to sell their products. The advisers are making these decisions.

The biggest issue is that the customer gets the right product for their needs at the appropriate price. A job advisers do very well.

The FSC and its predecessors have run into problems previously where it has stumbled into areas it should have avoided.

The fact that it has done this again shows poor leadership.

Its decision to pay Melville Jessup Weaver more than $200,000 to write a New Zealand version of the Trowbridge report is hard to understand.

It’s incredibly difficult to fathom why the FSC decided to accept MJW’s approach to writing this report without a clear brief on what it was addressing and more importantly not putting the research project out to a competitive tender.

There are many other organisations that had the ability to write this report.

This is a failure of management.

It is clear from my conversations with MJW and feedback from others that there was a very clear agenda behind this report.

Over the past week we have seen a number of reports that show the report started off down one track and then moved to another – anti-adviser one.

Partners Life and AIA have resigned their membership. Expect Asteron to follow suit and Fidelity Life should consider joining this camp too.

The sad thing is that the decision to write a report was an opportunity to address some issues and do some good things particularly around conflicts and churn.

My guess is that something new will come out of the demise of the FSC and it will be good for advisers and companies that choose to distribute their products via advisers.

Let’s be very clear risk advisers do a great job and they are passionate about helping people. It’s not all about commissions.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

Tags: FSC

« FSC must fix its own ructions before it can fix industryMJW report scores a D »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 12 November 2015 at 9:15 am Referee said:
Well said Phil.
On 12 November 2015 at 9:44 am From the Tron said:
I agree Referee. Well said Phil!!
On 3 January 2016 at 3:14 pm Comprehensive Planner said:
Good comments Phil, but I feel if we take a look at how and who funded this report we will clearly see that the greatest contributing FSC member is a company that actively works against advisers. This is evidenced in the complaint it laid with the FMA in October 2013 against one of its own advisers as a means of taking his client base without payment.

The FSC is an outdated entity run by a board and management with far too many conflicts of interest to list in the space available here so I feel the sooner it is folded the better for the advise profession.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 ▼4.95 ▼5.15 5.49
ANZ Special - ▼4.45 ▼4.65 4.99
ASB Bank 5.80 4.75 4.99 5.29
ASB Bank Special - 4.39 4.69 4.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.59 4.69 ▼4.99
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.99 5.29 5.59
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 5.45 5.50 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 5.00 5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.79 4.75 4.99 5.29
HSBC Premier 5.79 4.19 4.29 4.89
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.80 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.80 4.95 5.15 5.49
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.80 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.55 4.65 4.99
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
RESIMAC Special 5.00 - 4.75 -
SBS Bank 5.89 4.99 5.19 ▼5.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 4.59 4.69 ▼4.99
Sovereign 5.90 4.75 4.99 5.29
Sovereign Special - 4.39 4.69 4.99
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 4.55 4.69 4.99
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 5.05 5.19 5.49
TSB Bank 5.80 4.80 5.15 5.45
TSB Special - 4.55 4.69 4.79
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.95 4.99 5.19 5.44
Westpac - Capped rates - 5.26 5.36 -
Westpac - Offset 5.95 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac Special - 4.59 4.69 4.94
Median 5.82 4.78 4.99 5.29

Last updated: 15 November 2017 9:40am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com