About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, November 21st, 2:37PM
rss
Latest Headlines

FSCL to appeal court ruling

Financial Services Complaints Ltd is set to appeal a decision not to allow it to call itself an ombudsman.

Tuesday, May 16th 2017, 6:00AM 3 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

The use of the term “ombudsman” is restricted – those who use it have needed to obtain approval from the Chief Ombudsman, since 1991. Only three cases have been approved.

FSCL entered into discussion with the Chief Ombudsman in the middle of last year but its application was declined

The dispute resolution scheme then sought a judicial review, saying it wants the “gravitas” of the term as it is in direct competition with the Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman scheme. Both schemes represent insurers, financial advisers and other financial services industry participants.

Of the four external disputes resolution schemes operating in the financial services market, two are ombudsmen: The Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman and the Banking Ombudsman. 

But in the High Court this month, Justice Simon France said he was not persuaded that FSCL required the use of the term "ombudsman" to be able to establish itself as having the necessary qualities displayed by other approved schemes. 

He said the scheme had not been disadvantaged in any material way by its inability to call itself an ombudsman so far,

France noted that former chief ombudsman Brian Elwood had concerns about the potential proliferation of the term "ombudsman" and the confusion he thought had arisen since IFSO and the Banking Ombudsman started using the name. He added a public interest criteria to be satisfied in decisions, from 2002. He said it should only be on rare occasions that the name was used outside parliamentary or public service.

France said, considering the likely impact on the public understanding and perception of using the name "ombudsman" for a scheme specifically established for the purpose of the FSPRDR Act, meant extending its use to FSCL was not only unnecessary but would probably "have similar detrimental effects to those previously experienced".

He said the decision not to allow the name was not unreasonable.  "Although it is legitimate to ask when a consent will ever be given under section 28A of the Act, the restrictive policy cannot be said at this point to have close the door to any successful application in future."

Susan Taylor, chief executive of FSCL, said her organisation had already filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal. 

Tags: FSCL

« Roboadvice could come sooner than law reformLVR restrictions to be reviewed »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 16 May 2017 at 8:23 am Ron Flood said:
Last Thursday I read the article on EDR costs falling for Advisers. According to the reported figures, FSCL now has 6,500 members, an increase of 1,363 over the previous year.

IFSO on the other hand has 4,299 with an increase of around 200 last year.

Good luck trying to convince the High Court that you are being disadvantaged by not having ombudsman in your title.

Once again, the only winner's will be the lawyers.
On 16 May 2017 at 8:47 am Barry Read said:
Good points Ron. Also who benefits from the change? Consumer's don't get a choice on which scheme they use and as you point out it's not stopping people joining. So the only benefit is a change of title for the scheme. I wonder if FSCL members are happy having their fees spent on this case?
On 17 May 2017 at 9:32 am Dirty Harry said:
Does it not suit certain egos to be told FSCl is not an ombudsman?
Clearly if this sort of thing is in the budget, members must surely think there would otherwise be a lot more room for costs for advisers to fall even further.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Details confirmed for transitional licensing
    “And the other requirement is to have an internal complaint process as set out in the licence conditions. It’s good to see...”
    8 hours ago by Mr Slater
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    3 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    3 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    3 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    4 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 3.95 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 ▼3.89 ▲4.05 4.39
ASB Bank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.55 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.35 3.35 3.35
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank 5.80 ▼4.14 ▲4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 3.55 3.39 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 4.15 4.29 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.65 3.75 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 4.02 4.09 4.39

Last updated: 21 November 2019 9:39am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com