About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, August 24th, 11:50AM
Check out GoodReturns TV now! Dismiss
Latest Headlines

Robo exemption a win for big providers

Former FMA senior solicitor Simon Papa considers plans to allow roboadvice ahead of the law changes.

Monday, July 31st 2017, 5:59AM

Cygnus Law made submissions on the FMA’s June 2017 proposal to use its exemption power to permit personalised roboadvice to be provided to consumers (currently such advice can only be delivered by humans).  In the submissions I’m highly supportive of an exemption and I commend the FMA for taking the initiative to propose it.

The roboadvice exemption is important, as a new law permitting personalised roboadvice is not likely to be in force for another 1-2 years.  Other countries, including Australia, Singapore, the United States and the UK, already permit personalised roboadvice and have developing roboadvice sectors.  NZ risks being dominated by off-shore roboadvice service providers in future if we don’t soon provide space for a domestic sector to develop.   Roboadvice has a number of potential benefits, including helping to close the “advice gap”.

FMA’s Proposal

FMA’s proposed exemption will allow roboadvisers to provide personalised financial advice on a limited range of financial products subject to low value caps.  There will be very little regulatory oversight of the new services- there will be no prior checks on the providers except in relation to “good character”.  I consider that the limitations and caps in the proposal would not fully mitigate the risks presented by the proposed “light touch” approach and would tend to strongly favour services provided by product providers.

FMA’s proposed exemption has some attributes of a “regulatory sandbox”.  That is an approach to regulation that supports the development of new and innovative financial services businesses by allowing them to provide financial products and services without having to meet all usual regulatory requirements.  There are allied restrictions to protect their customers.  While I support the implementation of a formal regulatory sandbox by the FMA, my preferred option is that businesses wanting to use the exemption obtain a licence. 

Cygnus Law’s Preferred Option

I think that any business wanting to use of the roboadvice exemption should be required to obtain, as the key condition, “qualifying financial entity” (“QFE”) status (or should update an existing QFE status to meet roboadvice service requirements).  Under that approach there would be no mandatory service limits or value caps- they would be decided on a case-by-case basis during licensing.  That approach will give FMA and consumers greater confidence in the quality of roboadvice services provided pursuant to the exemption.  It should not require too much effort to update the current QFE regime (including the FMA’s QFE Adviser Business Statement Guide) to support roboadvice licensing under the exemption.  FMA can recover its costs via the existing QFE application and variation fees.  A licensing approach is consistent with the existing financial markets regulatory framework, which requires businesses to obtain a licence before providing most types of financial services to consumers.

Regulatory Sandbox

Regulatory sandboxes have been implemented in other countries, including in Australia, Singapore and the UK.  However, while the FMA’s proposal has some attributes of a sandbox, it lacks key controls and support mechanisms that mitigate the risks arising when a regulatory sandbox is implemented.  For example, under the Australian regime existing licence holders cannot use the sandbox, ASIC assesses all applicants and there are limits on the number of customers (100) and length of time the business can operate using the regulatory sandbox (12 months).  I support the development of a regulatory sandbox in NZ but only for start-up businesses.  In the case of roboadvice this would provide a valuable “stepping stone” towards obtaining a full licence and would help to support the development of independent roboadvice services.

Tags: ASIC FMA QFE regulation roboadvice

« The key ingredient for successThe start of a new era in financial planning »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Industry demands details
    “Nominated representatives I also don't see why the sector is puzzled about the role of nominated representatives. All licensed...”
    1 day ago by Murray Weatherston
  • Industry demands details
    “I don't understand what the issue raised above about complaints and EDRS is. Under FSLAA, the licensee is the entity (FAP)....”
    1 day ago by Murray Weatherston
  • Former Navy captain to steer Newpark into the future
    “Great to see Newpark taking the early initiative as well as appointing someone with such obvious experience and business...”
    2 days ago by Donald
  • Former Navy captain to steer Newpark into the future
    “Congratulations Newpark on an awesome strategy! By appointing a "skipper" (pun intended) with Deans credentials, you are...”
    6 days ago by The Oracle
  • Getting to Know: Peter Neilson
    “Interesting article. Isn’t it good we do have some decent people in our industry. What a joke that was when all those...”
    6 days ago by Brent Sheather
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News


Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 5.05 ▼5.25 5.59
ANZ Special - 4.55 ▼4.75 -
ASB Bank 5.80 4.85 5.19 5.49
ASB Bank Special - 4.45 4.79 5.09
BankDirect 5.80 4.85 5.19 5.49
BankDirect Special - 4.45 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.99 5.29 5.59
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 5.45 5.50 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 5.00 5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.79 4.85 5.24 5.49
HSBC Premier 5.79 4.09 4.29 4.89
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.80 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.80 4.95 5.29 5.59
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.80 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.45 4.79 5.09
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
RESIMAC Special 5.00 - 4.75 -
SBS Bank 5.89 4.99 5.29 5.59
SBS Bank Special - 4.59 4.85 5.25
Sovereign 5.90 4.85 5.19 5.49
Sovereign Special - 4.45 4.79 5.09
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 4.59 ▼4.79 5.09
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 5.09 ▼5.29 5.59
TSB Bank 5.80 4.80 5.15 5.45
TSB Special - 4.55 4.79 4.99
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.95 4.99 ▼5.19 5.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac - Capped rates - 5.26 5.36 -
Westpac - Offset 5.95 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.59 ▼4.79 5.09
Median 5.80 4.85 5.15 5.38

Last updated: 21 August 2017 10:06am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com