Investors lose out if worried managers ‘greenhush’
Investment managers so worried about falling foul of “greenwashing” rules may be going too far the other way and “greenhushing” their investments.
Wednesday, February 18th 2026, 7:28AM
Greenhushing has become a more significant problem around the world in recent years as regulators have clamped down on fund managers overstating their green credentials.
The Financial Markets Authority consulted last year on ethical investment disclosure guidance, saying that managers needed to keep their claims clear, have reasonable grounds for them and support them with evidence and facts.
As part of that consultation, it acknowledged that greenhushing could be a result of a lack of clarity about how to avoid greenwashing, or a response to a perception that regulatory or market expectations are too strict. “It is important for issuers to disclose the information that is material to investor decision making, which may include ethical characteristics, and it may be misleading to omit this.”
David Ireland, partner at Dentons, said the investment industry had evolved in the way it approached ethical and responsible investing claims.
“The initial reaction, I guess with people reacting to the FMA and to the ASIC action in particular on greenwashing has been ‘okay well you’re better to say nothing because actually as soon as you start talking about anything you’re doing that’s green, you’re going to be pinged’.”
ASIC has taken a hard line on misplaced green claims. It took a greenwashing case against Vanguard Investments Australia and made almost 50 regulatory interventions to address greenwashing misconduct in the 15 months to June 30, 2024.
Ireland said the problem was that not disclosing an investment stance could also be misleading.
“You might have a particular tilt that is not purely financial performance related – you should be disclosing that.
“Where you make that disclosure will be driven by how significant that is for your particular fund. Usually, that will just go in register information that you can refer people off to, so it wouldn't be in your main offer documentation, unless you were genuinely targeting stuff.
“But being coy about particular slants you're taking, particular focuses you're putting on your investment strategy can also be misleading, because you are not giving people the full picture as to the approach you are taking to investing.”
He said the question would be how material green focus was that was not being disclosed. That would dictate what the appropriate response might be.
“If it's just minor - no one's going to change their investment decision based upon a minor little ethical overlay you might put on some of your investments or a really minor exclusion - but if it's becoming operative in the way you're making investment decisions, then the transparency drive says, well, that's something that investors ought to be able to find out about.
“So somewhere in your publicly available documentation, people ought to be able to see that, so they can make a call as to, is this going to influence their investing decision? “
Ireland said there was a risk that regulators were creating a tangled web of what needed to be disposed and it could become confusing.
“And that was one of the concerns we've had with some of the disclosure guidance and commentary that comes out. So actually, you are almost forcing issuers of products to over-disclose or over-emphasize the extent to which they are being green, when actually it's not a big thing. It's not an ethical fund. They're not targeting any particular sustainability angle. And so it would then be wrong if you did state too much about it.
“But equally, if I'm saying I've got a general fund and I'm not going to invest in fossil fuels, but everything else is up for grabs…I just think from an investment approach, that that's not a good long-term punt. Then actually, no, I'm not going to shout that from the rafters because that's not a feature of the fund. But you probably need to have that somewhere in your information as to, ‘this is our investment approach’, so that those who are interested can actually see and they understand, okay, you haven't got an exposure to this particular type of asset class, and maybe that's going to influence me.
“So that's the drive, because green hushing was not a term that was used up until relatively recently. And now it is another buzz, yet another warning. You have to find the Goldilocks solution, right? You can't greenwash … But you still need to state what you are actually doing in the green space in some way, because that is equally relevant. Just reverse sides of the same coin in some ways. “
He said it was common in New Zealand. “I think, a really reasonable, pragmatic response from the initial alarms and concerns and what the FMA had been requiring of people”
He said it would be “disastrous” if regulators were mandating what had to be said because it could stifle innovation.
| « All Generate's funds get the ethical tick |
Special Offers
Comments from our readers
No comments yet
Sign In to add your comment
|
|
Printable version |
|
Email to a friend |
