About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, November 19th, 6:12PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Get real on disclosure

David Whyte argues other countries have already tackled the question of what to disclose on insurance application forms - and it's time we caught up.

Thursday, July 6th 2017, 12:21PM

The issue of what to disclose on an insurance application form has been a frequent source of heated debate, discussion, and dispute.

In industry terms, non-disclosure of material facts – those that would have influenced an underwriter’s decision - has been used as a reason for declining claims in the past.

Some progress has been achieved. Declining a claim on the basis of an undisclosed condition that is unrelated to the cause of the claim has been less and less contested by insurers.

But this is papering over the cracks, as the fundamental aspect of non-disclosure – inadvertent or otherwise – needs to be addressed, as it has in other OECD territories.

Concerns range from fraudulent and deliberate attempts to mislead insurers at one end of the spectrum, to claims departments apparently looking for any possible way to reject a valid claim.

No doubt there are occasions when both occur, but these are the exception rather than the rule, and all stakeholders need to move forward to a regime where disclosure rules do not penalise the innocent, nor leave insurers exposed to meeting invalid claims.

Careful attention the wording of terms and conditions will help, as will spelling out in plain English the nature, meaning, and impact of any exclusions applied at standard policy level, as well as any applied at the underwriting stage.

But there needs to be more consumer-friendly parameters around the disclosure/non disclosure treatment in the transaction of the contract.

Falling into line with Australia isn’t always a good thing, but in this instance, NZ has to bite the bullet. Without going into detail, the ability of an insurer to avoid a claim due to non-disclosure has been rendered more onerous than previously.

Like it or not, and there will be some objections from the industry, this amendment to current practice in NZ is on its way.

There will no doubt be dire warnings issued about the consequences of adopting a more consumer-friendly approach and it is likely that more claims will be paid as a result of accepting the amended treatment of non-disclosure.

But there are too many incidents in the past where claims have been negatively impacted and rejected to maintain the status quo.

Sure premiums will rise should claims increase as a result – but they will rise for everyone – that’s one of the fundamentals of insurance.

And while it may come as a shock to some commentators that adviser commission is not the only expense that has an impact on retails premium pricing levels, the potential adjustments in claims experience are a strong argument for the FSC publishing more detailed analysis of individual company statistics.

The current high-level marketing releases are interesting and significant, but a breakdown of such information, and a greater level of transparency, would greatly assist those seeking to inform consumers how and why issues like non-disclosure disputes should be consigned to history.

Tags: David Whyte Disclosure

« Kiwi company attracts $200 million global investmentnib tackles costs to keep premiums down »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Suncorp invests in wellbeing
Suncorp New Zealand has now invested a total of $20 million into wellbeing bonds as part of its focus on identifying sustainable investment opportunities that can deliver positive community outcomes.

AIA adds mental health support
AIA is boosting Vitality members’ donations to the Mental Health Foundation.

Major milestone for Cigna
Cigna, which acquired OnePath Life last year, is on the verge of reaching "a huge milestone".

Fidelity Life gets tick
Fidelity Life has been awarded the Accessibility Tick.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    3 days ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    3 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com