About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, February 26th, 10:19PM
Latest Headlines

Here's why you haven't seen many CEOs and senior execs recently

Russell Hutchinson outlines many of the issues insurance companies have their heads buried in at the moment, and why advisers haven't been seeing many of the industry leaders out and about.

Thursday, May 30th 2019, 8:52AM 2 Comments

by Russell Hutchinson

Insurers have been buried in work recently. Here on Good Returns, you can find an interview with Naomi Ballantyne, CEO, Partners Life, in which she talks about the effect of the effort required to respond to the FMA/RBNZ’s conduct and culture investigation.

The pressure is real, and it is being felt by every single insurer from large to small, from niche to mass market. Although you may find it hard to feel an awful lot of compassion for companies worth, typically, hundreds of millions of dollars, I invite you to feel some fraternal concern for the people that work in them.

If you’re wondering why you haven’t seen much of the life insurance sectors’ CEOs and senior leadership teams recently, this is why:

In addition to the conduct and culture review, there are two major consultations going on right now, with tight timeframes. The first is the Conduct of Financial Institutions options paper, the second is the Insurance Contract Law options paper.

Both were issued by MBIE at the end of April and submissions are due by the end of next week. Although each paper is ‘only’ a few dozen pages long the impacts of some proposals have potentially huge effects. If we get the law wrong, we could damage distribution of insurance considerably. Two proposals illustrate the risks.

  • If the proposals require insurers to have too much responsibility for suitability this could wreck adviser distribution through duplication of costs. I am sure that is not the intention, but it is a good example of what is at stake when responding to a consultation on the options.
  • If proposals for insurance contract law require that medical information is obtained in every case then the cost burden on consumers could rise substantially. Again, this is not an intention, but a risk. The desire from everyone at MBIE right the way through the industry, is for an efficient marketplace where affordability is enhanced.

Those issues are just two examples. I could offer at least a dozen more. The impact is such that one corporate lawyer, who has a prodigious capacity for work, remarked that once this is done, with they would quite like to stare at a blank wall for a month.

But they won’t get a chance. After the options papers, we will return to work associated with the implementation of the new adviser law, then before we know it there will be draft law to contemplate, and then implementation.

It is not as if this were taking place against a backdrop of a lack of other activity. At the same time the market is absorbing two large acquisitions, and the industry is grappling with proposed accounting changes that could affect the amount of capital they are required to hold.

After a long period of relative calm, change, and therefore risk, in the insurance sector is rising rapidly.

Tags: Russell Hutchinson

« Odd priorities – and how some are resolvedCan you spot the single-issue fanatics? »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 31 May 2019 at 1:24 pm all hat, no cattle said:
He can stare at that blank wall when this is done.
Oh, wait, now the Disclosure consultation is taped to that wall.

So much is at stake, and so little time is allowed, just like the code - we got 5 weeks, then it went quiet and sat on MBIE and minsiterial desks for about 5 months.

The conduct and culture thing treats big issues as minor thoughts: such as vesting of trails. And capping commissions. These things should be consultations in their own right not mixed in with "should claims be paid within a set time frame...?"
On 4 June 2019 at 8:37 am Doggy said:
I hope everyone has pricked up their ears at the suggestion of (both life and F&G) insurers having responsibility for suitability of advice.

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Southern Cross launches advisory group
Southern Cross Health Society has announced the establishment of a Māori governance advisory group in a first for New Zealand’s health insurance sector.

HealthLink and Konnect NET to merge
Healthcare technology companies HealthLink and Konnect NET are merging.

Fidelity scores top award for third consecutive year
Fidelity Life has been named 2019 Life Insurance Company of the Year by ANZIIF for the third consecutive year.

Suncorp invests in wellbeing
Suncorp New Zealand has now invested a total of $20 million into wellbeing bonds as part of its focus on identifying sustainable investment opportunities that can deliver positive community outcomes.

News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com