About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, July 18th, 2:41PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Urgent building law reform needed - Goff

Problems with building law have long been rife. Now Auckland’s Mayor is calling for radical reform of the Building Act and Code to deal with the housing crisis.

Monday, June 17th 2019, 10:56AM 2 Comments

by Miriam Bell

The Government is currently consulting on proposed changes to the Building Act which it says will address long-standing challenges in the building sector.

But Auckland Mayor Phil Goff says the proposals don’t go far enough and Auckland Mayoral Housing Taskforce and Auckland Council submissions recommend major changes which go beyond them.

He says the Building Act and Building Code need radical and urgent reform to make them fit for purpose to tackle New Zealand’s housing crisis.

“Aucklanders deserve to have greater assurance that when they buy a new home or renovate an existing one, the work done will be of high standard.

“It’s time to change the situation whereby shoddy building products and poor design and workmanship are a cost loaded on to ratepayers rather than those whose incompetence cause the problem.”

He says the weather tightness issue cost ratepayers $600 million because those who did the poor work are nowhere to be found and the council as the consenter is the “last man still standing”.

The Government’s proposals, which would be the biggest changes to the Building Act since 2004, aim to improve the regulation of building products and modern methods of construction including offsite manufacturing.

They would also strengthen occupational regulation; look at how risk and liability are managed; possibly reduce the building levy; and strengthen penalties for those who don’t comply with the law.

However, Goff says that what is needed is a compulsory insurance and warranty scheme that directly incentivises companies to do the job properly.

It would also mean that general ratepayers through council would only have to meet a fair proportion of liability for substandard work.

A centralised and mandatory product register to certify that building products are fit for purpose is also needed as it is absurd that 69 different councils have to separately certify the same products, Goff says.

“Duplication like this adds costs and inconsistency. Doing it centrally would be far more efficient.”

He also wants to see a Licensed Building Practitioners scheme to ensure builders and associated trades have the skills, training, ongoing professional development and ethics to do the job properly.

“Finally, the building code is also below international standards in what it requires for buildings to be energy efficient.

“Higher standards for insulation, ventilation, and efficient heating and lighting systems for new houses would cut energy use, reduce carbon emissions, ensure better health and wellbeing, and cut heating costs.”

Building and Construction Minister Jenny Salesa says clear and robust building laws are critical to enabling the building sector to reach its full potential and the proposed reforms will help achieve that.

But Goff, who welcomes the move to reform building law, says the Government needs to go further than what is included in its discussion paper and to act with a greater sense of urgency.

More information about the Government’s proposals can be read here and submissions on the proposals can be made till June 18.

Tags: Auckland building compliance developers insurance property investment

« Free Investment Property Showcase Events: Auckland, Wellington and ChristchurchHomesellers required to provide IRD number »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 17 June 2019 at 12:43 pm John Butt said:
Well that will increase building costs which will flow into second hand housing very quickly.
On 19 June 2019 at 3:08 pm bArt said:
It's a bit rich of Mr. Gough to say "Weather tightness issue cost ratepayers $600 million because those who did the poor work are nowhere to be found and the council as the consenter is the “last man still standing”.
At the time that these buildings with "Weather tightness issues" were consented council insisted on approved materials being used, get to tell everyone if they can build, where they may build, and what they may build (even on their own land). They tell us how long we get to build, take a cut for local area contributions and finally get to inspect several times at various stages of a build. The council should stop blaming others and show reponsibility for the fees and rates they demand. It is a wonder anybody wants to build at all!

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Pathfinder-backed KiwiSaver to target gender diversity
    “This is a great initiative by Pathfinder - congratulations on taking a risk, and standing up for something that you believe...”
    4 hours ago by Pragmatic
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “@all Put your cheque books away - no need to pay the lawyers to do the research to provide an opinion...... In my old...”
    20 hours ago by Murray Weatherston
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “Further reading - Kinsington Swan in February 2018 https://www.kensingtonswan.com/news-updates-and-events/financial-advice-reforms-insights-series-14-penalties-enforcement-complaints-and-disciplinary-matters/...”
    1 day ago by all hat, no cattle
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “MPT and Murray this might help https://www.fma.govt.nz/assets/Fact-sheets/Who-will-need-a-licence-to-provide-financial-advice...”
    1 day ago by all hat, no cattle
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “Thanks Murray, it seems we are on the same page. Be great if the regulators could confirm or not. AHNC, I agree I dont...”
    1 day ago by MPT Heretic
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.69 4.35 4.35 4.55
ANZ Special - 3.85 3.85 4.05
ASB Bank 5.70 4.29 4.35 4.55
ASB Bank Special - 3.89 3.85 4.05
BNZ - Classic - 3.85 3.85 4.05
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.40 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.85 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.80 4.69 4.59 4.79
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.80 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.60 4.75 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.80 4.69 4.49 4.45
HSBC Premier 5.89 3.79 3.79 3.89
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.65 3.85 3.95 3.89
Kiwibank 5.80 4.60 ▼4.60 ▼4.74
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.65 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 3.85 ▼3.85 ▼3.99
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 4.89 4.99 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.14 4.19
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.79 4.85 5.05 5.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 3.85 3.85 3.99
Sovereign 5.80 4.29 4.35 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.89 3.85 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.65 3.89 3.89 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.65 4.39 4.39 4.55
TSB Bank 5.69 4.45 4.35 4.55
TSB Special - 3.95 3.85 4.05
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.79 4.69 4.79 5.19
Westpac - Offset 5.79 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.85 3.85 4.05
Median 5.80 4.35 4.35 4.19

Last updated: 15 July 2019 9:47am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com