tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, October 29th, 12:20PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Income protection: Lessons from over the ditch

Representatives of Swiss Re give New Zealand insurance sector advice on how to solve unsustainable income protection losses.

Tuesday, October 13th 2020, 9:56AM 1 Comment

by Daniel Smith

At this morning’s session of the FSC Generations Conference, Australian representatives of Swiss Re offered New Zealand insurers some helpful lessons on avoiding unsustainable losses in income protection (IP).

In Australia, loose definitions and poor data have meant that IP has given unsustainable losses across the Australian insurance sector.

But before New Zealand insurers begin to feel too smug we should be aware that many of the issues Australia faces are present in our markets.

While our insurers do ask about investment income disclosure and offset claims for ACC, New Zealand IP claims also have benefits that do not conform to the principle of indemnity.

Like Australia, New Zealand has seen an increase in IP claims incidence and duration, if current trends continue the New Zealand insurance sector could see themselves in a similar situation to Australia.

The key focus for Swiss Re senior underwriting consultant, Shane Burdack is that “product design must retain incentive for the claimant to return to work”.

Currently the data shows that there is a financial incentive for the claimant to not return to work. And many will be in a better position financially on total disability IP for the duration of their return to work plan.

Product solutions leader, Kimberly Robinson capped off the session by offering suggestions for the New Zealand markets to avoid the pitfalls of Australia.

The key points were: 

  • replacement ratios need to truly reflect an applicant's net assets 
  • underwriters must investigate more deeply into investment assets and other forms of non-employment income and adjust the coverage accordingly
  • the current total disability definition is unsustainable and needs to have a greater focus on duties performed, rather than its current focus on hours worked 
  • the current model with it’s “10-hours rule” does not provide good outcomes for the claimant or the insurer 
  • the partial disability claims should have rehabilitation as a core part of their underwriting in order to shift the focus away from a strict financial buffer for the client's loss of income to a more holistic focus on the health and wellbeing of the client.

Tags: FSC Income Protection Swiss Re

« AIA rolls out new claims management service Asteron (and Suncorp) appoints new boss »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 17 October 2020 at 10:45 pm JPHale said:
While I agree with much of the commentary in this article. There is a distinct misunderstanding on the need of the client against the sustainability of the insurer.

We know that working is better than sitting on claim for people, I agree that a focus on working and rehab is needed.

However, the discussion on indemnity fundamentally misunderstands the needs of the majority of clients. I understand the issues on the abuse of claims that happen.

Employees are pretty straight forward. But self-employed and business are not well understood by insurers.

One of the key issues with claims in the self-employed space is the desire to insure for the lifestyle they had when they took cover.

The aspects of assets and other non-earned income is part of the equation. Setting the abuse of IP aside, the typical S/E claimant typically they are continuing to work through a decline in health, before hitting the claim.

In this time they are typically using their assets to top up the decline in income, many unaware of the medical issues causing what’s going on.

When they hit the point of claim, they have used their external financial resources, and that reality is what triggers the oh crap we need to look at a claim situation.

We have a section of the population that is abusing disability claims, the genuine ones need to be considered and offered a level of priority. Manage the fraud, protect genuine claimants.

(As both an adviser and an agreed value claimant in the last 18 months, I do have insight into these issues from all angles. I’m at the end of it and recovering, and my insurers have been excellent. As to over insured, a matter of perspective, I wouldn’t say so, as I don’t see an increased bank account from it...)

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

AIA pimps up its Quick Quote calculator
AIA has enhanced its Quick Quote tool, which it says provides an opportunity to attract new, more qualified customers.

Southern Cross to bring mental health programme to kiwi kids
The programme aimed at helping kiwi kids navigate life’s ups and downs will soon be available free of charge to any primary or intermediate school in New Zealand.

AIA reveals grant winners
AIA has revealed the financial advisers and advice businesses that will be given financial backing for their community initiatives.

Insurer nib backs Ronald McDonald House with $20k investment
Health insurer nib New Zealand and its nib foundation have lent support to Ronald McDonald House Charities.

News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x