About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, November 27th, 4:34PM
Latest Headlines

Tax incentives promoted

Friday, March 30th 2001, 8:09AM

by Philip Macalister

The Health Funds Association says the introduction of tax incentives for private health insurance would help bolster the public health service in New Zealand.

A report, written by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research for the association, concludes that tax incentives would pass the national welfare cost-benefit test. It argues that under such a scheme more would be invested in the health sector, than the money forgone in tax revenue.

It also says the incentives could target lower income households.

NZIER's Alex Sundakov says two things came out of the research once it started. The first is that tax incentives where a better option for promoting the uptake of private health insurance, as opposed to changing the fringe benefit tax treatment of premiums.

This is because not everybody is in the work force.

Secondly the issue was as much about health policy, as it is about tax policy.

The idea of incentives has received muted response from politicians.

Tax incentives for health insurance aren't on the government's work schedule, nor is it doing any work on the subject, a spokesperson for Finance Minister Michael Cullen says.

National's former health and revenue minister Wyatt Creech says National is doing a complete review of its policies.

He says the report provides a "serious intellectual base" for the party to use in its policy making.

If tax incentives for health insurance provide a "net public benefit, then it's worth looking at," he says.

Labour's coalition partner, The Alliance, has a totally different position.

List MP Philidda Bunkle says the party is totally opposed tax incentive for private health insurance.

She argues under such a regime the public health system gets run down and the cost for health is carried more heavily by the lower socio-economic groups than higher ones.

HFA executive director Andrea Pettett is realistic about the political reaction: "Achieving tax reform isn't going to happen overnight, and it won't," she says.

This is the association's first piece of major work and it will continue pursuing the subject, she says.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« Health insurers may be forced out of businessHellaby backs Club Life »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Strategy Thoughts
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • RFA standards set to lift
    “@R1, I heard the interview on Radio NZ and thought the same thing. The Minister does not seem to have a handle on the industry...”
    18 hours ago by Graeme Tee
  • The birth of the Retirement Income Group
    “Ralph here, thank you for taking the time to respond. We have built the product to support advisers who provide retirement...”
    24 hours ago by Ralph Stewart
  • MJW missed their chance
    “Let me summarise the argument: MJW (and banks): Commission paid to non-tied advisors is too high. Advisors: If MJW...”
    2 days ago by b p
  • RFA standards set to lift
    “The other elephant in the room is the QFE's and their advisers (be they AFA'a or staff) (mis-)selling their products and...”
    2 days ago by R1
  • MJW missed their chance
    “Excellent comments Michael Naylor. I often agree with your insights and analysis, although do hold different views occasionally...”
    3 days ago by Tony Vidler
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News


Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com