tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
OUT NOW: ASSET Mag KiwiSaver Special - Read it here Dismiss
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, December 16th, 7:39PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Risk evaluation paints alarming picture

The first ever risk evaluation of the New Zealand insurance market has painted an alarming picture of an industry in the grips of a margin squeeze

Friday, November 7th 2003, 2:32PM

by Rob Hosking

The first ever risk evaluation of the New Zealand insurance market has painted an alarming picture of an industry in the grips of a margin squeeze.

Australian-based Harvest Partners carried out the survey of 12 New Zealand insurance companies and the resulting report says some hard decisions will have to be made.

There has been too much price competition in the industry, says Harvest partner Peter Ramjan.

The report says that "the writing is on the wall" for profitability in the disability income and trauma group of products.

There are signs the industry has already begun adjusting premiums in this area,.

More than two thirds of the 12 firms lifted their risk product premiums over the past year.

A clearer indication of the trend comes in the difference between the average premium of existing business and the average premium of new business. In 1999 the gap was only about $100: by last year it had grown to around $400.

The survey interviewed not only senior executives in the 12 companies but also managers in the claims, actuarial, product and underwriting areas.

A large number confirmed they are not meeting their profit criteria - 64% in the case if disability income, 32% in trauma insurance. Broken down by segment, the senior executives tended to be more optimistic than other areas.

The actuaries were the most pessimistic - 45% expected a decrease in profitability. Again, disability income is the most problematic problem areas.

Managers were asked not only about their own firm but also how they viewed prospects for their main competitors, and the industry as a whole.

Overall, managers tended to believe their main competitors are performing better than the industry as a whole.

The main causes for lack of profitability are too low a price, the high cost of distribution,

and too wide definitions. Nearly 40% of the firms have changed definitions over the past year, and Ramjan suggests that more will have to do so.

Most managers also believe that there will be a major market rationalisation over the next five years. Most senior managers believe there will be only six to ten firms operating in New Zealand by 2008.

Rob Hosking is a Wellington-based freelance writer specialising in political, economic and IT related issues.

« Lumley takes another awardMixed reviews from advisers on FMA regulation »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Partners Life hikes premiums again
Partners Life is lifting the cost of its Private Medical Cover again, with premiums set to rise to 23% for existing business with policy anniversaries on or after 22 October 2025.

Insurtech company wins FSC Innovation of the Year Award
Insurtech company aiming to clean up life insurance legacy systems wins innovation award.

UniMed offers support to members with cancer
UniMed partners with Osara Health to provide enhanced cancer support

Chubb Life CEO wraps up three-month adviser tour
Chubb Life NZ CEO Paula ter Brake has wrapped up the Midwinter Connect series, where she met with over 800 advisers across 11 locations. The three-month nationwide tour began 24 days into her new role.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Opes censured by FMA for poor practices
    “Opes are allowed to run a business whereby they market & sell new-build properties on behalf of builders/developers and receive...”
    1 day ago by Amused
  • Opes censured by FMA for poor practices
    “@Amused, so agree, when have they ever, ever said this asset class (property) may not be a good investment. Also, it is only...”
    1 day ago by Backstage
  • Opes censured by FMA for poor practices
    “Just had a read of Opes disclosure statement online and Opes have the following companies. Opes Property (real estate...”
    4 days ago by valkyrie6
  • Opes censured by FMA for poor practices
    ““The business model creates a risk of conflict of interest between the financial advice provider and the client, making...”
    4 days ago by Amused
  • Opes censured by FMA for poor practices
    “While the article describes Opes as a “financial planning firm,” it is important to be precise about language. Financial...”
    4 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x