About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Saturday, February 22nd, 9:09PM
Latest Headlines

Suprising new marketing techniques

Two advisers I know have recently taken the churn debate right into the public domain and uses it as a positive marketing strategy: in almost exactly opposite ways.

Monday, August 17th 2015, 1:09PM

The first talks about ‘sharks’ and highlights the value of retaining policies for the long-term. His business is focused on getting clients to take out enough cover and hold it for a long time. In other parts of his documentation he quotes Asteron Life statistics showing the average age of cancellation of products, and the average age of claim. 

His business is the insurance equivalent of the buy-and-hold strategy to optimise value. Product and insurer selection are given a reasonable focus, but within the context of an overall planning approach which also picks up a wider financial planning and risk management context.

The other adviser talks extensively about product change.

He gives real-world examples of premiums being hiked when policies have been in-force a while and the changing features and benefits. He goes into some detail about different claim scenarios and what is paid when. He compares the likely pay-out amounts and studies the detail of product and provider selection very closely.

His business is the insurance equivalent of the trader – he details the conditions under which he believes a switch should occur and makes it clear to clients that is how he will deliver value to them – by moving them to the new best product.

There’s the switching issue right there for you, uncomfortably present in an adviser value-proposition to clients. Some people would give it another name, perhaps depending on whether they would win or lose in the transaction.

So this highlights the access and advice issue powerfully.

There is a question of whether it is adviser-led or client-led?

I think that the client must at least have something to do with it. The issue is increasing client sophistication: they are used to researching, comparing, selecting, and switching between an increasingly bewildering numbers of options in almost every sphere of consumption, from kitchen benches to mobile telephones. So they expect the same with insurance.

Of course the adviser must have something to do with it as well. If I were an insurer I would want the freedom to deal with both advisers, but I might not want to pay them in quite the same way.

Tags: Asteron Churn Russell Hutchinson

« Robo-advice – The regulator’s choice?Today’s consumer can be hard work »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Southern Cross launches advisory group
Southern Cross Health Society has announced the establishment of a Māori governance advisory group in a first for New Zealand’s health insurance sector.

HealthLink and Konnect NET to merge
Healthcare technology companies HealthLink and Konnect NET are merging.

Fidelity scores top award for third consecutive year
Fidelity Life has been named 2019 Life Insurance Company of the Year by ANZIIF for the third consecutive year.

Suncorp invests in wellbeing
Suncorp New Zealand has now invested a total of $20 million into wellbeing bonds as part of its focus on identifying sustainable investment opportunities that can deliver positive community outcomes.

News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com