tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, August 13th, 9:40PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

FSCL: New rules could help non-disclosure problems

External disputes resolution providers say non-disclosure is a big issue for the New Zealand insurance industry, and advisers could be doing more to help.

Thursday, March 2nd 2017, 10:00AM 3 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman Karen Stevens said about 11% of the complaints her office received last year related to non-disclosure.

She said there needed to be a law change on non-disclosure to help customers who accidentally left out information when they applied for insurance.

“We need legislation to bring us more in line with the law in Australia and the UK, preferably an Insurance Contracts Act. This would help prevent many consumers from finding themselves in the difficult situation of being uninsured, or potentially, uninsurable.”

She said advisers needed to remember they had a role in educating clients about their obligations. She said if they were filling out forms for their clients, they needed to remember that there was the possibility the client might complain about them in future. She said her office sometimes got complaints from clients who said they did not understand or were not told about what they were meant to disclose.

At FSCL, chief executive Susan Taylor said her office received one or two complaints a month from clients who said an adviser had not properly explained their duty of disclosure when they took out a policy.

“Or the client says that they told their adviser about a certain medical condition and the adviser has said not to bother writing that down on the insurance proposal form. These complaints infer that the adviser is acting in his/her own interests - to sell the product, rather than the client’s interests,” she said.

“Under the current review of the FAA, it is proposed that all advisers will be required to place the client’s interests first, and all advisers will be subject to a new code of professional conduct, that will endorse the 'client’s interests first' rule. I hope this will, in time, lead to a reduction in the complaints that we see.”

Tags: FSCL

« Kiwi company attracts $200 million global investmentAdvisers must add value in digital future »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 3 March 2017 at 2:15 pm Barry Read said:
The issue of clients stating the adviser told them to not put it down is in some cases a red herring. There is evidence in Australia from an ASIC claims review that claim decline rates via direct channels caused by non-disclosure are higher than advised channels. We see more cases where the non-disclosure is caused by clients disclosure differing from Doctors notes or records. Doctors write one thing and tell the clients another. Out of 5 cases we have seen where clients blamed advisers for non-disclosure the adviser has been able to show that they sent the clients copies of the personal statements reminding them of their duty to disclose and to ensure that the statements are correct. Even after this the clients blamed the adviser for the non-disclosure. The real issue is if the non-disclosure is material to the cover type and claim. There needs to be a better process to handle disclosure and assessment of risk for insurance, not a change in adviser obligations.
On 3 March 2017 at 2:53 pm Tash said:
This issue was covered in another forum under an emotive heading claiming insurance law was ruining lives. I've replicated one of the comments thereto that I think is spot on below...

This will dramatically drive up premiums or result in additional exclusions/reduced cover. Not fair on the diligent/honest. We should stop rewarding those who cannot be bothered to read terms and conditions and then expect others to bail them out. A famous Justice once said the law of equity is there to protect the diligent not the imprudent! And by the way, it is not unscrupulous insurers 'ruining lives' it is the non-disclosure by the applicant.
On 3 March 2017 at 3:40 pm Tash said:
The law quite correctly places a duty of disclosure on applicants because the matters pertaining to their health, are known to them alone.

It would be useful if Karen Stevens could share her thoughts on how and what 'accidently left out' means in practice. The risk is that every non-disclosure is 'accidentally left out', which no solution either.

My experience with insurers in NZ is that immaterial non-disclosure of minor issues, issues one can be forgiven for 'accidentally forgetting' is not the problem. The problem is with clients who, for whatever reason, do not properly disclose what is asked of them. I suspect this is often due to not understanding the importance of disclosure and what is required, an area where a skilled adviser can help enormously. Should disclosure be an obligation of the adviser? No clearly not, but, advisers should be in a position to and actually give, suitable advice and guidance around filling out the forms. When in doubt disclose!

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Insurer nib backs Ronald McDonald House with $20k investment
Health insurer nib New Zealand and its nib foundation have lent support to Ronald McDonald House Charities.

Less stressed during lockdown
New Zealander’s health and wellbeing had surprising benefits from the Covid-19 lockdown.

Southern Cross supports new safe haven for at-risk pets
Southern Cross Pet Insurance has teamed up with Pet Refuge to provide temporary shelter for animals affected by family violence.

nib Foundation supports Lifeline to the tune of $150,000
To support the growing mental health needs of Kiwis emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic, Lifeline Aotearoa has increased its service capacity thanks to a $150,000 grant from nib foundation, the charitable arm of nib New Zealand (nib).

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • It starts with governance
    “Thanks JP, if we know what the rules are we can follow them, if we know what the solutions are we can implement them....”
    20 hours ago by Adviser1
  • Record gold prices 'could go higher'
    “Happy to be made wiser by Gold aficionados, but this years Gold rally seems one of the unexpected and possibly irrational...”
    21 hours ago by Davidvs
  • It starts with governance
    “Hi JP, good analogy of what would be a sensible way to approach the new landscape for March 2021. Governance does not have...”
    1 day ago by gavin austin adviser business compliance
  • It starts with governance
    “@Adviser1 this is part of the discussion we need to have as an industry. It is also part of the message we have with the...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • It starts with governance
    “Thanks Gavin, appreciate your comments. So by engaging a compliance consultant and having the necessary policies, procedures...”
    2 days ago by Adviser1
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x