About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 13th, 10:03PM
Latest Headlines

FADC case shows RFAs face big challenges under new laws

While it has been no surprise with the passing of FSLAB, we now have confirmation that the light at the end of the tunnel is, in fact, the oncoming train.

Thursday, April 11th 2019, 9:09AM

And while that statement often has more sinister connotations, my meaning is the change that has been talked about for so long, and we have been waiting for, is now about to break and wash across all of us.

Also, while we have all had a pretty good idea what this all means and looks like, it's come with a more recent plot twist most of us probably didn't anticipate, even though it has been written in the back and white for the better part of a decade.

What I'm eluding to is the recent FADC decision against an AFA doing insurance. Here's my two cents and some of it won't be appreciated. I get that. At the same time, we RFA's have been operating based on a loose expectation that we would be measured by the AFA standard if called to account.

Though the expectation of measurement against the AFA Code and the reality for RFAs, has seen that the FMA to date has had little in the way of traction to pursue RFA’s. This has somewhat muted the noise and association to the AFA standard if called to account as an RFA.

However, the latest FADC judgement is quite some words of warning that we in RFA land need to take heed of. Yes, while this is focused on an AFA, it has been an opportunity for the FMA to put a typical risk process through the mincer and make an example of it for us to see how this may play out with the future and FSLAB.

And an example it is, with no names published and commentary that this is at the low end of the scale, it's not book throwing just yet. However, with the decisions made we all are going to have challenges meeting the bar laid out with how we operate based on what we consider good practice to be.

What I mean by this is we are operating under the assumption that ’best practice’ from the industry is good enough for the regulator and the law, and potentially we are a little complacent when it comes to what that really means.

I've had the same opportunity as you to read what's been published, and the adviser concerned has had their two cents too with helping understand things. Which has been appreciated and the comments have been helpful with context and without being overly emotive or critical.

As I said in a similar comment on one of the articles, I'm not going to comment on the evidence, it is what it is, and I don't have access to it to review it though I have had the opportunity to reflect on a number of opinions around this since I made my original comments.

On the whole, reading through this I side with the respondent that the interpretation of the adviser requirements is potentially unreasonable when measured against present conduct expectations for insurance.

So if this is unreasonable for an AFA, then most RFAs have some significant issues to be concerned about with what is coming under FSLAB now that it has passed.

From what I have read and discussed, there appear to be some key learnings that we as insurance advisers are going to have to take into account looking forward:

  • Context and environment
  • Professional conduct expectations, practice vs law
  • The measure of suitability

Also, I appreciate that most of what follows is based on the current AFA standard and not the new code, which we are yet to see.

First off, I picked up on some potential red flags in context and managing the environment. Did this contribute to the situation?

The process described in the report suggests that time and impatience was a contributory issue; what I did not get from this is the context of the environmental situation.

If in the workplace, were there ears listening? Did this have a bearing on the quality of disclosure for the respondent, or was it purely an issue of haste?

We've all had clients cagey about information for various reasons, and the environment is often one of the issues. Is this tantamount to breaching CS8, I wouldn't think so, but here we are...

I'll leave you with this for now, as a few have commented, like the stories, they're just a bit long. I'll cover my thoughts on these key points in my next rambling article.

Tags: FADC FSLAB Jon-Paul Hale RFA

« Churn keeps coming up in discussions, everywhere. In the insurers, with advisers, and with regulators.Part 2: FSLAB & FADC and what it means for us RFAs »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 4.05 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.55 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 3.89 4.05 4.39
ASB Bank Special - 3.39 3.55 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.49 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.65 4.75 4.75 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 5.65 4.75 4.75 -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.54 3.54 3.69
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank ▼5.20 ▲4.20 4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▲3.45 3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 3.39 3.45 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 ▼3.89 ▼4.05 ▼4.39
Sovereign Special - ▼3.39 ▼3.55 ▼3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.39 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 3.99 4.07 4.39

Last updated: 9 December 2019 9:02am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com