tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, October 14th, 11:36AM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

nib: government has no appetite for tax breaks for health ins premiums

Health insurer nib New Zealand doesn't think the current government has any appetite to provide tax breaks for health insurance premiums.

Friday, April 5th 2024, 8:34AM 1 Comment

by Jenny Ruth

However, both it and AIA New Zealand say they would be ready to work with the government to improve health outcomes for Kiwis.

“There has to be appetite from the government to go that way. And we don't see that,” a nib spokeswoman said.

AIA NZ chief executive Nick Stanhope says the health system is facing “some big challenge” as the aging population grows.

“New Zealanders are increasingly needing support to manage their everyday health and wellbeing as well as respond to health issues which might arise,” Stanhope says.

“At AIA NZ, we believe [the] private sector can work together with the government to help improve health outcomes for New Zealanders and relieve pressure on the public health system,” he says.

“For example, we can see the value in improving and incentivising access to private health insurance to help take the load off the public system and ensure it has capacity for people who need it most.”

Stanhope says as one of the largest life insurers in the world, AIA is well-placed to explore what works well in other markets.

He says an approach to encourage people to make lifestyle improvements and take preventative measures is also something AIA can help with.

Newly appointed nib NZ chair Hanne Janes says that “there is certainly huge strain on the public health system and innovative ways need to be investigated to change access to health delivery, improve outcomes and innovate in the area of funding.

“nib is committed to working with government and third parties to try to identify what can be done differently.” nib is sponsoring the NZ Initiative's health summit scheduled for August this year.

A 2014 paper by NZIER found that making health insurance premiums tax deductible would probably create “a fiscal hole” for the government because the cost of subsidising those who already have health insurance would likely outweigh any benefits.

However, that paper looked at a range of measures that could be adopted by the government, including levying those with high incomes who don't have private health insurance or using an employer-based system which automatically enrolled employees into a health insurance scheme but allowed them to chose to opt out, in a similar fashion to how KiwiSaver works.

GoodReturns asked both Southern Cross and Partners Life to comment on whether NZ should make health insurance premiums tax deductible but received no response.

Tags: nib

« Lindsay sells Strategy Reserach to Trail after cancer experienceSouthern Cross latest insurer to get FMA warning »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 27 March 2024 at 1:01 pm Backstage said:
The headline does say, Doesn't think the current Government...etc, and that could be right but I think we need to persist. It could most likely fall toward ACT's wheelhouse.

Taking pressure off the public system having private hospitals conducting more elective procedures must assist the public system.

There is a sensible conversation to be had and that conversation should not be muddied by some insurer trying to promote preventative marketing plans. A 68 who is paying $9,000 per year premium is not going to put on a fitbit and do star jumps to try save a few dollars in premium. Tax relief is what that person would benefit from and that is the discussion.

The same discussion has helped us market Income Protection over time.

On many occasions we claim Income Protection premiums which could save folk from landing on a sickness benefit, there must be some way that some tax relief can be calculated on private medical insurance that can make sense.

A focused, sensible discussion that especially considers the aged who are having to give up their plans because of premium cost is a major issue. This continues to happen at a time when they most need the cover, this should be the focus. I do not feel looking overseas is required, this is a local issue and it needs to be kept focused and simple.

Also perhaps another discussion with the Commerce Commission about medical plans that are still being marketed that can result in clients paying premiums for medical plans that could end up with major short falls in funding treatment this resulting in clients having to get public treatment.



Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Employees are wanting health and life insurance
A new survey shows potential employees what life and health insurance benefits, but less than a third of employers plan to offer such benefits.

Chubb Life makes changes to trauma benefit
Chubb Life has made a series of enhancements to its Assurance Extra and Assurance Extra Business policies, including the addition of a new Continuous Trauma Benefit,

Resolution Life gets new president
Global life insurance group Resolution Life has appointed Moses Ojeisekhoba as its new President.

Today is Mindfulness Day - here's a new tool
Former Director-General of Health Sir Ashley Bloomfield gets involved with a new online mindfulness practice.

News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x