About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, November 19th, 1:16PM
Latest Headlines

Selling a bit less than ideal

In a household with two adults working and a couple of children, plus the uncomfortable presence of a large mortgage snuggling up next to them every time they hit the couch of an evening, money is tight.

Monday, July 23rd 2018, 4:25PM

It is hardly news to mention that children and houses are expensive. These clients are probably both the text book example of people that need good risk protection – and people that will struggle to make room in their budget for the protection they need.

So, what is ideal for these people?

A couple of streets away friends of mine are in a similar situation to this, and they told me what they planned to do: cut out all the income protection, halved the trauma, and had enough life cover for the home loan and a residual $50,000 of trauma cover.

In the ensuring discussion I ended up promoting the idea of at least having some home loan/mortgage cover: sufficient to meet loan repayments if either adult becomes temporarily disabled.

Of course, not being a financial adviser, I had to refer them back to their adviser at the end of the conversation with a plea to at least consider the mortgage cover. It isn’t ideal, but it would help.

What bothers me is that ‘it isn’t ideal’ part of the equation. Surely what’s ideal depends on your goal.

If your goal is full indemnity – enough insurance that you can ‘live the same life’ – then the ideal is just that.

But what if your goal is ‘get the minimum cover to ensure we keep the house’ – perhaps there is an ideal cover for that goal?

Whenever I’ve been taught about goals I’m told that they have to be realistic. “Keep the house” is a realistic goal for most middle-market clients with affordability issues. Now what’s ideal for them?

Most advisers tend to offer life, trauma, and mortgage cover to this market. Typically, the life cover is to the full value of the loan, often plus a bit, the home loan cover is a premium product, an excellent definition of disability, with a ‘to age 65’ benefit period and lots of nice extras.

Banks take a different approach with at least two of the major mortgage lenders choosing to halve the life cover for each life and instead offer redundancy cover as a top up.

The mortgage cover is typically low cost – but limited to total disability, and often a two-year benefit period.

Although it is true that a two-year benefit period will cover most income protection claims, I wouldn’t choose to leave the other features of a good mortgage cover out of the mix.

I think the ideal includes partial disability cover, a strong definition of disability, no offsets, rehabilitation benefits, and cover increase options. Plus, what’s ideal now, given this budget, will change.

I like the idea of a mortgage cover that is the solid foundation for a full income protection as the client’s budget allows.

Tags: Russell Hutchinson

« Did the Australian Royal Commission change everything? Or had everything changed already? Wearable devices: The promise and the reality for insurance »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Suncorp invests in wellbeing
Suncorp New Zealand has now invested a total of $20 million into wellbeing bonds as part of its focus on identifying sustainable investment opportunities that can deliver positive community outcomes.

AIA adds mental health support
AIA is boosting Vitality members’ donations to the Mental Health Foundation.

Major milestone for Cigna
Cigna, which acquired OnePath Life last year, is on the verge of reaching "a huge milestone".

Fidelity Life gets tick
Fidelity Life has been awarded the Accessibility Tick.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    2 days ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    2 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com