About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, November 22nd, 10:19AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Conduct, consumers, advisers, and insurers

What links these forces?

Monday, October 29th 2018, 11:44AM

Russell Hutchinson

With all the talk about potential change in the advice industry, the announced changes in the provision of financial product have been far the greater.

The challenging questions being asked around conduct, consultation on further law changes, that could result in a new regulator – or at the very least, new powers for an existing regulator.

Follow that up with the news about AMP, added to the sale of OnePath, and before that the sale of Sovereign, and you have an incredible passage of change. It all affects the provision of advice, and the future for advice.

There is a debate going on between regulators and insurers about what constitutes good conduct. There is some blurring of the lines between product provision and advice provision in this discussion.

Insurers are being asked how they ensure that clients receiving their products as a part of your advice consultations are receiving good advice. Regulators are worried that through commission payments insurers’ own conflicts make could affect advice recommendations for their product.

That is worth testing, of course, as events in Australia underline.

The discussion is important to you too, however, as there is a risk of an unintended outcome: the loss of independence in advice. That could occur if insurers become responsible for too much of the advice process, and the scope for innovation, difference, and freedom to advise in different ways is reduced.

I think that there is plenty of room to work on good conduct outcomes without compromising your freedom to advise, but this is a discussion you may have a view on.

The areas you might take an interest in the overlaps between, say, Financial Advice Code and insurer conduct include:

  • Commissions and incentives
  • Protections for vulnerable clients
  • Affordability and eligibility issues
  • Helping clients to understand the value of different products
  • Services provided for fees received

There are probably more.

In the midst of all that, corporate decision-making is re-shaping the face of insurance advice provision for 2019 and beyond. Three of the largest names in the insurance industry have changed.

The loss of AMP’s life offer to the New Zealand market is one which I find particularly saddening. AMP was number one in this market when I started work here.

To think it will close to new business shows that no-one is insulated from the forces of market change. Recent events, perhaps the Australian Royal Commission, may be cited as contributing factors.

It is probably more important to name the long-running consumer themes – the relentless shifts occurring in health, wealth, consumerism, awareness, and changes towards more living benefits.

These are really the cause of most of the change we see in the market. Whenever we see a big change for someone else, the big question is ‘what changes should I be making?’

Tags: Russell Hutchinson

« How much trauma cover?Can you comply with the new Code? »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Suncorp invests in wellbeing
Suncorp New Zealand has now invested a total of $20 million into wellbeing bonds as part of its focus on identifying sustainable investment opportunities that can deliver positive community outcomes.

AIA adds mental health support
AIA is boosting Vitality members’ donations to the Mental Health Foundation.

Major milestone for Cigna
Cigna, which acquired OnePath Life last year, is on the verge of reaching "a huge milestone".

Fidelity Life gets tick
Fidelity Life has been awarded the Accessibility Tick.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Details confirmed for transitional licensing
    “And the other requirement is to have an internal complaint process as set out in the licence conditions. It’s good to see...”
    1 day ago by Mr Slater
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    4 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    4 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    4 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    5 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com