tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Sunday, April 12th, 9:35PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Clients complain: Adviser should have told us to obtain notes

A client's complaint that their insurance adviser or insurance company should have told them to request their medical notes when they took out a policy has been dismissed by the Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman.

Thursday, December 20th 2018, 3:00PM

The couple applied for a range of insurance products, including standalone medical cover, in 2011.

The woman made a claim in 2017.

During the assessment of the claim, the insurer obtained her medical notes.

It retrospectively added an exclusion to her medical cover, on the basis that she had failed to disclose her history of lower back pain.

The couple complained on the basis that the insurer should have requested their notes before the policy began.

Alternatively, they said, their adviser should have told them to get the notes.

The IFSO case manager said the onus was on the client to give the insurer their medical information.

Two other underwriters who were presented with the case said, had they been given the same information, they would have applied an exclusion to the policy.

The case manager said it was material and the insurer was entitled to rely on the non-disclosure clause to alter the terms of the policy

In relation to the adviser's obligation, the IFSO case manager said it was reasonable to expect the adviser to tell a person completing an application about their duty of disclosure, even if there was no statement about it included at the start of the application form.

But the case manager did not believe that there was any active obligation for a financial adviser to specifically advise an applicant for insurance to obtain a copy of medical notes, provided the applicant had been adequately warned about the disclosure obligations.

In this case, there was evidence that the couple had received a warning.

They also complained about a delay in adding their son to their medical policy.

They said they asked the adviser to do so in 2012 but it did not happen until 2013.

When they tried to claim for a tonsillectomy for him in 2015, they were turned down because it was a pre-existing condition.

They said, had the adviser added him when asked, that would not have happened.

IFSO said there was no evidence of that 2012 meeting and so the adviser could not be held responsible.

 

Tags: IFSO insurance

« Not acceptable that ACC doesn't cover illness: OECDMixed reviews from advisers on FMA regulation »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

Spurs and Auckand FC to meet in Auckland
AIA NZ is the Major Partner for Tottenham Hotspur’s return to New Zealand, with the team set to face Auckland FC at Eden Park later this year.

Fidelity Life keeps its rating for another year.
Fidelity Life has once again had its A- (Excellent) financial strength rating affirmed by AM Best.

AIA releases Neurodiversity Toolkit
AIA NZ has released its Neurodiversity Toolkit to the public for the first time.

AIA brings back Apple watch
AIA brings back the Vitality Apple Watch Benefit.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • FMA to review CoFI Guidance
    “Conduct of Financial Institutions (CoFI). Yes, it all sounds great in principle folks however the new law change fast...”
    2 days ago by Amused
  • FMA to review CoFI Guidance
    “Hewes reiterated that CoFI and the financial advice regime were deliberately designed to operate side-by-side, not hierarchically...”
    3 days ago by Aggressively_passive
  • Active manager (sort of) leaves the passive house
    “Probably the best outcome after trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. I wonder who's owning that decision. ...”
    3 days ago by John Milner
  • AIA’s new product designed for life
    “It should be noted that this updated version of the article originally published on 26th March corrects the messaging/misrepresentation...”
    6 days ago by Paul Flood
  • Short-Term Disability Benefits
    “Seems pretty straight forward to me. Its five years from point of disability, and ACC offsets is factored into the (industry)...”
    9 days ago by Snoopdog
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x